Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Makedonon Protes Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 200 BC - 101 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Kostial#1008, Göbl Kelt#Pl. 2 E4
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A club depicted vertically in the central field, surrounded by a wreath of oak leaves and acorns. The Greek legend MAKEΔONΩN appears above the club, with ΠPΩTHΣ inscribed below, referencing the first meris of Macedonia. A thunderbolt is positioned to the left of the club within the wreath, serving as a secondary symbol. The overall design closely imitates the coinage of the Roman province of Macedonia Prima, executed with varying degrees of fidelity by Celtic engravers.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The "Makedonon Protes" designation places this type among the earliest Celtic imitations derived from the tetradrachms of Philip II of Macedon, a coinage that flooded the ancient world following the Macedonian conquests and remained a prestige template for Celtic die-cutters for well over a century. Exactly which tribe produced this eastern European variant remains unresolved — the attribution to "uncertain eastern European Celts" reflects genuine scholarly disagreement, not cataloging laziness.

Göbl's placement on Plate 2 suggests a relatively early stylistic position within the sequence of devolution from the Philippic prototype.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT