Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Liegendem Achter Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Hammered
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Heavily stylised 'Baumreiter' (tree-rider) figure mounted on horseback, moving to the left, in the highly abstracted Celtic artistic idiom derived from the Macedonian horseman prototype. The horse's body is rendered in a schematic, almost disjointed manner typical of Eastern Celtic coinage, with limbs reduced to linear strokes. Four pellets are arranged before the horse, with an additional pellet below, serving as decorative or symbolic field elements. The rider is similarly abstracted, merging with the horse's form in the characteristic late Celtic artistic style. No legend or inscription is present on the reverse field.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (300 BC - 201 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

The "Liegender Achter" — literally "recumbent figure-eight" — type belongs to a cluster of imitative coinages derived from the Macedonian tetradrachms of Philip II, filtered through successive generations of Celtic reinterpretation until the original prototype became barely recognizable. Attribution to a specific tribe remains unresolved; the broad "eastern European" assignment reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty rather than carelessness, as the distribution of finds spans a wide arc from the middle Danube into the Carpathian basin.

Kostial 433 and Castelin 1274 place this among the more abstract derivatives of the Philip II tradition.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT