Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Dacians of Transylvania |
|---|---|
| Năm | 200 BC - 101 BC |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | Tetradrachm (4) |
| Tiền tệ | Drachm |
| Chất liệu | Silver |
| Trọng lượng | 12.63 g |
| Đường kính | 23 mm |
| Độ dày | |
| Hình dạng | Round (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Hammered |
| Hướng | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo | Kostial#660, Göbl Kelt#Pl. 27, 311/4 |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Celticised, laureate and bearded head of Zeus to right. |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Rider on horseback to left. |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | |
| Cạnh | |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
ND (200 BC - 101 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4576101840 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: This Tetradrachm, issued by the Dacians of Transylvania (200-101 BC), marks a pivotal pre-Burebista era. Dacian tribal confederations were consolidating power, trading, and interacting with Celtic neighbors and the expanding Roman Republic. Substantial silver coinage, often imitating Greek and Macedonian prototypes, served as a medium of exchange and a symbol of economic autonomy and political identity among Dacian groups.
Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, typical of tribal coinage. Stylistically, it belongs to a "barbaric" imitation school, heavily influenced by Macedonian Tetradrachms. The obverse features a highly stylized, abstract head, often a degenerate interpretation of a Hellenistic deity. The reverse, giving the coin its "Kegelreiter" (cone rider) designation, depicts a simplified horse and rider, frequently rendered with a conical head or body, embodying a unique local artistic interpretation distinct from Hellenistic origins.
Technical/Grading: Struck in silver, this example weighs 12.63 grams and measures 23 millimeters, adhering to typical Tetradrachm standards. Key high-points on the obverse include clarity of stylized facial features. On the reverse, the horse's body, legs, and the rider's conical form are crucial for assessing strike quality. Dacian issues often exhibit variable centering and strike pressure, sometimes resulting in partial design loss, yet well-preserved examples show crisp central motifs.