Katalog
| Emittent | Dacians of Transylvania |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 200 BC - 101 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Tetradrachm (4) |
| Währung | Drachm |
| Material | Silver |
| Gewicht | 12.63 g |
| Durchmesser | 23 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered |
| Ausrichtung | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | Kostial#660, Göbl Kelt#Pl. 27, 311/4 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Celticised, laureate and bearded head of Zeus to right. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende | |
| Reversbeschreibung | Rider on horseback to left. |
| Reversschrift | |
| Reverslegende | |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (200 BC - 101 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 4576101840 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This Tetradrachm, issued by the Dacians of Transylvania (200-101 BC), marks a pivotal pre-Burebista era. Dacian tribal confederations were consolidating power, trading, and interacting with Celtic neighbors and the expanding Roman Republic. Substantial silver coinage, often imitating Greek and Macedonian prototypes, served as a medium of exchange and a symbol of economic autonomy and political identity among Dacian groups.
Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, typical of tribal coinage. Stylistically, it belongs to a "barbaric" imitation school, heavily influenced by Macedonian Tetradrachms. The obverse features a highly stylized, abstract head, often a degenerate interpretation of a Hellenistic deity. The reverse, giving the coin its "Kegelreiter" (cone rider) designation, depicts a simplified horse and rider, frequently rendered with a conical head or body, embodying a unique local artistic interpretation distinct from Hellenistic origins.
Technical/Grading: Struck in silver, this example weighs 12.63 grams and measures 23 millimeters, adhering to typical Tetradrachm standards. Key high-points on the obverse include clarity of stylized facial features. On the reverse, the horse's body, legs, and the rider's conical form are crucial for assessing strike quality. Dacian issues often exhibit variable centering and strike pressure, sometimes resulting in partial design loss, yet well-preserved examples show crisp central motifs.