Katalog
| İhraççı | Kos (Carian Islands) |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 201 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Tetradrachm (4) |
| Para birimi | Attic drachm |
| Bileşim | Silver |
| Ağırlık | 17.11 g |
| Çap | 31 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Head of beardless Heracles right wearing lion skin headdress. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Zeus seated on stool-throne left, eagle on outstretched right hand, sceptre in left hand; in left field, crab. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | Greek |
| Arka yüz lejandı | ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | Cos, Caria, modern-day Kos island, Greece |
| Basma adedi | ND (-201) |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 5865453413 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This tetradrachm, struck in 201 BC by the Carian island of Kos, represents a posthumous issue in the name of Alexander III, a testament to his enduring economic and political legacy. During the tumultuous Hellenistic period, Kos, a significant naval power and center of healing, found stability in adhering to Alexander's widely recognized coinage standard. Issuing these coins allowed Kos to assert its commercial autonomy while participating in the broader Aegean economy, where Alexander’s types remained a universal currency.
Artistry: The coin’s artistry reflects the prevailing Hellenistic style, blending idealized form with emerging realism. The obverse features the traditional head of Herakles right, adorned with the Nemean lion-skin headdress, often interpreted as an idealized portrait of Alexander. The reverse depicts Athena Alkidemos standing left, holding a shield and brandishing a spear, a powerful emblem. The anonymous engraver adhered to established iconography, maintaining high craftsmanship typical of Alexander’s imperial coinage.
Technical/Grading: Struck in silver, this tetradrachm weighs 17.11 grams and measures 31 millimeters, consistent with the standard for the denomination. Critical technical points include the strike quality on Herakles’ lion-skin and facial features, and on Athena’s helmet crest and drapery folds. A well-centered strike with minimal die wear and a sound flan would indicate a superior example. Variations in flan shape or minor off-centering are common considerations, impacting the overall grade and aesthetic appeal.