See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm; Gondophares IV Sases

Issuer Indo-Parthian Kingdom
Year 46-72
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness 2 mm
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Standing figure of Zeus in the Hellenistic tradition, facing left, with his right hand raised in a gesture of benediction or authority, and holding a long scepter in his lowered left hand. A control mark occupies the left field, while a nandipada symbol surmounted by the Kharosthi syllable 'va' appears in the upper left field. The reverse design reflects the syncretic Greco-Bactrian artistic influences prevalent in Indo-Parthian coinage, blending Hellenistic iconography with local religious and dynastic symbolism.
Reverse script Kharosthi
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Gondophares IV Sases ruled the eastern remnant of Indo-Parthian territory during a period when the kingdom was fragmenting under sustained Kushana pressure from the north. His tetradrachms in billon reflect that decline — earlier Indo-Parthian issues were struck in far purer silver, and the progressive debasement visible across this dynasty's coinage tracks the erosion of both trade revenues and political control over the Indus valley routes.

Senior 242 is one of the better-documented attributions in a series that remains genuinely difficult to sequence, partly because multiple rulers used the dynastic name Gondophares.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE