Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Bartkranzavers Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 200 BC - 1 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round (irregular)
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Highly schematized Celtic horse progressing left, reduced to its essential geometric components in the characteristic abstract style of Eastern European Celtic coinage. The horse's body is rendered as a large sinuous arc, with a curved neck and vestigial limbs indicated by short strokes below. A prominent spiral or ringlet motif appears to the right, likely a degraded rider or charioteer element derived from the Macedonian Philip II tetradrachm prototype. A group of pellets arranged in a scattered pattern occupies the upper field, possibly representing a degraded symbol or control mark. No legend or inscription is present.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The "Bartkranz" — literally "beard wreath" — designation refers to a stylistic convention found across a cluster of Celtic silver issues from the middle Danube region, where the original Macedonian tetradrachm prototypes were progressively abstracted over generations of copying. Attributing these to a specific tribe remains genuinely unresolved; candidates include groups operating in the Carpathian basin during the late La Tène period, but the die evidence does not yet support a clean tribal assignment.

Göbl's typology for this group remains the reference framework, with Kostial providing supplementary die linkage data.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT