Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Eastern European Celts |
|---|---|
| Year | 200 BC - 1 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Highly schematized Celtic horse progressing left, reduced to its essential geometric components in the characteristic abstract style of Eastern European Celtic coinage. The horse's body is rendered as a large sinuous arc, with a curved neck and vestigial limbs indicated by short strokes below. A prominent spiral or ringlet motif appears to the right, likely a degraded rider or charioteer element derived from the Macedonian Philip II tetradrachm prototype. A group of pellets arranged in a scattered pattern occupies the upper field, possibly representing a degraded symbol or control mark. No legend or inscription is present. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The "Bartkranz" — literally "beard wreath" — designation refers to a stylistic convention found across a cluster of Celtic silver issues from the middle Danube region, where the original Macedonian tetradrachm prototypes were progressively abstracted over generations of copying. Attributing these to a specific tribe remains genuinely unresolved; candidates include groups operating in the Carpathian basin during the late La Tène period, but the die evidence does not yet support a clean tribal assignment.
Göbl's typology for this group remains the reference framework, with Kostial providing supplementary die linkage data.