Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Audoleon Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Tetradrachm (4)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A stylized horse standing left in a boldly rounded, almost geometric Celtic rendering, with the body composed of large globular masses suggesting musculature. The horse's head is turned slightly, with decorative pellet-and-leaf ornaments above and around it, characteristic of Eastern Celtic coinage derived from Paeonin prototypes. Scattered pellets and abstract linear symbols occupy the field around the horse, including what appear to be schematic limb or weapon forms below. The overall composition fills the flan in a lively, decorative manner consistent with the Audoleon type group. No legend or exergual inscription is present.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (300 BC - 201 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

The Audoleon type takes its name from a Paeonian king active around 300 BC, whose Philip II-derived coinage circulated widely enough across the central Balkans to inspire Celtic imitations for generations. Who exactly struck these pieces remains unresolved — attribution to specific tribal groups in the eastern Celtic periphery is contested, and the "uncertain" label in most references reflects genuine scholarly disagreement rather than incomplete research.

Göbl's classification system placed these within a stylistic sequence showing progressive abstraction from the Macedonian prototype, each generation of dies moving further from the source.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT