Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Alexander III Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round (irregular)
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Seated male figure, derived from the enthroned Zeus type of Alexander III tetradrachms, depicted facing left in a highly stylized Celtic rendition. The figure holds what appears to be an eagle in the outstretched right hand and a long scepter in the left, both rendered in a schematized, almost abstract fashion characteristic of Eastern Celtic coinage. The throne is reduced to a series of decorative pellets and geometric elements beneath the figure. To the right of the figure, a vertical barbarized pseudo-legend reading ΛΛCEI+VI is present in the field, representing a degenerate imitation of the Greek ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ legend. Additional Celtic decorative symbols appear in the left field.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (300 BC - 201 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

Celtic tribes across the Danube basin began producing imitative tetradrachms of Alexander III sometime in the late 4th century BC, initially copying Macedonian prototypes with reasonable fidelity before progressively abstracting the designs through successive die generations. What survives is effectively a visual record of transmission — each workshop copying not the original coin but the previous copy, with accumulated distortions that allow specialists to reconstruct approximate geographic and chronological sequences. The "Uncertain Eastern European" attribution reflects genuine scholarly disagreement; these pieces circulated widely enough that provenance alone rarely settles the question of origin.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT