Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain Cilician city |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 375 BC - 333 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Tetartemorion (1⁄24) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Facing head rendered in archaic style, depicted full-face within the coin's circular field; the features are boldly modelled with prominent eyes, a broad nose, and closed lips, the head slightly inclined. The hair is swept back and secured, with a suggestion of a wreath or headband visible at the crown. The striking surface is notably broad relative to the coin's diminutive flan, with the face occupying nearly the entire field. No legend or inscription is present. The style is consistent with Cilician workshop production of the fourth century BC. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (375 BC - 333 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
At 0.20g, these fractional pieces represent the smallest denomination in regular Greek commercial use — one-quarter of an obol, itself already a fraction. Cilicia in this period sat under loose Achaemenid oversight, with local dynasts and cities retaining enough autonomy to strike their own silver while still paying tribute to Persia. The attribution remains contested; Kagan's corpus groups several visually similar issues under uncertain Cilician origins precisely because the region's mint output from this period has never been systematically untangled from neighboring Lycian and Phoenician production.