Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetartemorion

Uitgever Uncertain Cilician city
Jaar 375 BC - 333 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Tetartemorion (1⁄24)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Facing head rendered in archaic style, depicted full-face within the coin's circular field; the features are boldly modelled with prominent eyes, a broad nose, and closed lips, the head slightly inclined. The hair is swept back and secured, with a suggestion of a wreath or headband visible at the crown. The striking surface is notably broad relative to the coin's diminutive flan, with the face occupying nearly the entire field. No legend or inscription is present. The style is consistent with Cilician workshop production of the fourth century BC.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (375 BC - 333 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

At 0.20g, these fractional pieces represent the smallest denomination in regular Greek commercial use — one-quarter of an obol, itself already a fraction. Cilicia in this period sat under loose Achaemenid oversight, with local dynasts and cities retaining enough autonomy to strike their own silver while still paying tribute to Persia. The attribution remains contested; Kagan's corpus groups several visually similar issues under uncertain Cilician origins precisely because the region's mint output from this period has never been systematically untangled from neighboring Lycian and Phoenician production.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT