Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Stater - Ranaditya
| Issuer | Sindh Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Year | 450-475 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A stepped fire altar, depicted frontally with a rectangular firebox supported by a tiered pedestal of two receding plinths, rendered in bold schematic relief typical of Indo-Sasanian coinage. The altar occupies the central field, flanked to the right by a vertical Brahmi legend reading the royal epithet attributed to Ranaditya. A further symbol or attendant figure appears faintly in the left field near the coin's rim. The design reflects the Zoroastrian-influenced iconography common to the post-Kushano-Sasanian coinage of the Sindh region. |
| Reverse script | Brahmi |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Sindh kingdom in the mid-fifth century sat at a contested crossroads between the declining Gupta sphere and the advancing Kidarites and later Hephthalites pressing down from the northwest. Ranaditya's precise position within Sindh's dynastic sequence remains disputed among scholars, and the attribution of these staters to him rests primarily on numismatic evidence rather than any surviving inscriptional record.
The electrum composition is telling — not a deliberate alloy choice in the classical sense, but almost certainly a sign of degraded bullion supply or deliberate debasement under fiscal pressure. Staters attributed to this ruler are rare in any condition, with only a handful of specimens recorded in major institutional collections.