Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Sceat 'Carip' group
| Uitgever | Early Anglo-Saxon |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 710-760 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | 0.97 g |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | CARIP |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Facing architectural or throne-like motif, centrally placed within the field, depicting a stepped or panelled structure interpreted as a stylized throne or altar flanked by two upright cross-topped standards or sceptres with pellet terminals. A crescent or similar device appears at the top of the field above the central motif. Small pellets are scattered throughout the field, and the whole design is enclosed within a beaded outer border. The composition is characteristic of the 'Carip' group reverses and ultimately derives from late Roman or Byzantine iconographic conventions. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The 'Carip' group takes its name from the retrograde or garbled inscription appearing on specimens within this series — almost certainly a corrupted rendering of a moneyer's name rather than a place or authority. By the early eighth century, sceat production in England had fragmented badly, with dozens of regional types struck by issuers whose identities remain unresolved. Attribution to a specific kingdom is still contested; Metcalf placed these within a broader East Anglian or Mercian orbit, though the evidence is distributional rather than documentary.