Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Pfennig unknown ruler
| Issuer | Bishopric of Gurk (Austrian States) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1200-1241 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Reverse displays a frontal enthroned ecclesiastical figure, consistent with the type of a seated bishop in full pontifical regalia, including a mitre surmounted by a cross pattée at center chest. The figure raises both arms outward in a formal hieratic posture, flanked by two upright architectural elements resembling columns or candlesticks. The field is flat and largely unadorned, characteristic of the hammered bracteate-influenced pfennig coinage of the Bishopric of Gurk in the early 13th century. The flan is irregular and the strike moderately centered. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Bishopric of Gurk, founded in 1072 by Archbishop Gebhard of Salzburg, operated as a suffragen see with limited but real temporal authority in Carinthia. These bracteate-style pfennigs were struck under episcopal minting rights during a period when the exact succession of bishops makes precise attribution genuinely difficult — hence the "unknown ruler" designation, which reflects an unresolved scholarly problem rather than careless cataloging.