Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Kingdom of Persis |
|---|---|
| Year | 60-85 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | 10 mm |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Standing figure of the king Nambed to the left, rendered in a schematic linear style typical of Persis fractional coinage, positioned to the left of a prominent star-and-crescent symbol occupying the right portion of the field. The crescent is depicted open to the left with dotted pellets within its arc, and a star above. Aramaic inscription arranged around the field identifies the ruler. The overall composition follows the established iconographic tradition of the Persis dynasts, combining royal figural imagery with astral symbols. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (60-85) |
| Additional information |
Persis was one of the few regions that maintained semi-autonomous dynastic rule under Parthian overlordship, issuing its own silver coinage long after neighboring kingdoms had been absorbed entirely. The fractional silver of this period — obols struck to weights well under a gram — circulated alongside Parthian drachms in what was effectively a two-tier monetary system, local fractions serving retail exchange that imperial coinage could not efficiently serve.
The Nambed attribution in Alram and Sunrise places this piece within a sequence that remains poorly understood chronologically. Exact reign boundaries for Nambed are still debated among specialists.