Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Obol
| Uitgever | Uncertain Cilician city |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 400 BC - 380 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Round (irregular) |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Cilicia in this period was a patchwork of semi-autonomous dynasts and city-states operating under loose Achaemenid suzerainty, many striking their own fractional silver without consistent attribution. The specific issuing authority behind this obol remains unresolved despite appearing in three major reference works — Levante, Jameson, and Göktürk each catalogued it independently, and none achieved a firm civic assignment.
The attribution problem is compounded by the sheer number of small Cilician mints active during the late fifth and early fourth centuries, several of which have never been positively identified with a known ancient toponym.