Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Obol
| Issuer | Uncertain Cilician city |
|---|---|
| Year | 400 BC - 380 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND |
| Additional information |
Cilicia in this period was a patchwork of semi-autonomous dynasts and city-states operating under loose Achaemenid suzerainty, many striking their own fractional silver without consistent attribution. The specific issuing authority behind this obol remains unresolved despite appearing in three major reference works — Levante, Jameson, and Göktürk each catalogued it independently, and none achieved a firm civic assignment.
The attribution problem is compounded by the sheer number of small Cilician mints active during the late fifth and early fourth centuries, several of which have never been positively identified with a known ancient toponym.