Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain Cilician city |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 400 BC - 301 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | 0.77 g |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Head of a youthful male deity, likely Ares or a local hero, facing left, wearing a crested Attic helmet adorned with a laurel wreath. The hair is rendered in detailed waves beneath the helmet, and the neck is partially draped. The style reflects the high-quality engraving tradition of 4th-century BC Cilician mints, combining Greek artistic conventions with local iconographic preferences. The flan is irregular, consistent with hand-struck hammered coinage of the period. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (400 BC - 301 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Cilicia in the fourth century produced a remarkable proliferation of small silver fractions from cities and dynasts whose precise identities remain disputed — a direct consequence of Achaemenid administrative practice, which permitted local authorities broad autonomy in coinage so long as tribute obligations were met. Göktürk's cataloguing of these pieces has brought some order to the series, but attribution of individual issues to specific mints remains contentious among specialists.
The "uncertain Cilician city" designation here is honest rather than evasive.