Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Uncertain Cilician city |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 400 BC - 301 BC |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | 0.77 g |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Head of a youthful male deity, likely Ares or a local hero, facing left, wearing a crested Attic helmet adorned with a laurel wreath. The hair is rendered in detailed waves beneath the helmet, and the neck is partially draped. The style reflects the high-quality engraving tradition of 4th-century BC Cilician mints, combining Greek artistic conventions with local iconographic preferences. The flan is irregular, consistent with hand-struck hammered coinage of the period. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | ND (400 BC - 301 BC) |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Cilicia in the fourth century produced a remarkable proliferation of small silver fractions from cities and dynasts whose precise identities remain disputed — a direct consequence of Achaemenid administrative practice, which permitted local authorities broad autonomy in coinage so long as tribute obligations were met. Göktürk's cataloguing of these pieces has brought some order to the series, but attribution of individual issues to specific mints remains contentious among specialists.
The "uncertain Cilician city" designation here is honest rather than evasive.