Каталог
| Эмитент | Alaisa Archonidea |
|---|---|
| Год | 344 BC - 338 BC |
| Тип | Standard circulation coin |
| Номинал | 1 Litra |
| Валюта | Litra |
| Состав | Bronze |
| Вес | 32.46 g |
| Диаметр | 30 mm |
| Толщина | |
| Форма | Round (irregular) |
| Техника | Hammered |
| Ориентация | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Гравёр(ы) | |
| В обращении до | |
| Каталожные номера | Campana#5, CNS#14, HGC 2#186 |
| Описание аверса | Laureate head of Apollo Archagetas left. |
|---|---|
| Письменность аверса | Greek |
| Надписи аверса | APXAΓETAΣ |
| Описание реверса | Torch between two stalks of grain. |
| Письменность реверса | Greek |
| Надписи реверса | ΣYMMAXIKON |
| Гурт | |
| Монетный двор | |
| Тираж |
ND (344 BC - 338 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1138862630 |
| Дополнительная информация |
Historical Context: Alaisa Archonidea, active between 344 and 338 BC, likely represents a local ruler or magistrate within a Greek city-state, probably in Sicily or Magna Graecia, given the "Litra" denomination. This period was marked by significant political upheaval across the Greek world. The issuance of a substantial bronze litra, weighing 32.46 grams, underscores Alaisa Archonidea's independent authority, facilitating local commerce and asserting sovereignty during a turbulent era.
Artistry: The specific engraver of this Litra remains unrecorded, common for much ancient coinage. Its period of issue places its artistry firmly within the Late Classical Greek stylistic school, characterized by a move towards greater naturalism and expressive detail, departing from earlier, more rigid forms. While the precise iconography is not provided, such bronze issues typically featured representations of local deities, mythological figures, or civic emblems relevant to the issuing authority, executed with developing mastery of three-dimensional form.
Technical/Grading: This large bronze Litra, measuring 30mm and weighing 32.46 grams, presented significant striking challenges. High-points, crucial for assessing wear and strike quality, would typically include the most raised elements of the design, such as hair, facial features, or musculature. Technical strike qualities often vary widely for ancient bronze. A well-struck example exhibits a full, centered design with sharp details, indicative of fresh dies and optimal striking pressure. Conversely, weak strikes, off-center alignment, or flan flaws are common.