Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Hemiobol Uncertain Mint 'Gorgoneion'
| Uitgever | Uncertain Carian city |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 500 BC - 400 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Hemiobol (1⁄12) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Forepart of a boar advancing to right, the animal's head lowered with one foreleg extended forward in a striding pose; the design is contained entirely within a square incuse punch, typical of early Greek hammered coinage. The incuse square is well-defined, and the boar's bristled neck and snout are rendered with summary but recognizable detail. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (500 BC - 400 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Small fractional silver of this type circulated widely across Caria during the fifth century, when the region operated under a patchwork of semi-autonomous dynasts and cities striking their own issues before Hecatomnid consolidation tightened monetary control in the fourth century. The specific mint remains unattributed despite the reference, and attribution attempts have been complicated by the near-identical iconographic vocabulary shared across dozens of western Anatolian minting authorities of the period.