Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Hemidrachm

Uitgever Tenos
Jaar 520 BC - 500 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Drachm
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Bunch of grapes depicted facing, rendered as a cluster of large raised pellets arranged in a triangular form tapering toward the base, characteristic of the archaic Cycladic coinage style. The bunch is set prominently within the round flan, with individual berries clearly articulated as bold spherical bosses. The field surrounding the grape cluster is plain and unadorned. No legend or inscription is present. The design is a well-known emblematic type associated with the island of Tenos, reflecting the region's viticulture.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (520 BC - 500 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

Tenos, one of the smaller Cycladic islands, produced coinage during this period in quantities modest enough that surviving specimens cluster almost exclusively in European institutional collections. The Boston MFA example is among the handful used to establish the type's chronology. Little is documented about the island's mint authority in the Archaic period, and the attribution to this two-decade window rests primarily on stylistic comparison with better-attested Cycladic issues rather than any hoard evidence specific to Tenos.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT