Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Mytilene |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 377 BC - 326 BC |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Electrum |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | A lion depicted in a dynamic striding pose to the right, with head turned slightly upward, rendered in robust relief within a recessed incuse square framed by a linear border. The musculature of the animal is boldly articulated, with the tail arched over the back and the forelegs extended in a powerful stride. The design is contained within a shallow incuse square, a characteristic feature of Mytilene's electrum coinage, providing a stark contrast to the high-relief obverse type. The field within the linear square is plain. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Mytilene |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Mytilene and Phokaia operated under a formal agreement — confirmed by ancient sources and corroborated by hoard evidence — to produce electrum coinage on a shared standard, alternating reverse types on an annual basis. This coin falls within that long-running bimetallic convention, which persisted even as Persian political control over the Aegean coastline fluctuated dramatically across the fourth century. The arrangement was commercial rather than political; both cities needed a trusted, high-value trading coin acceptable across the eastern Aegean and into Black Sea markets.
Bodenstedt 83 places this hekte toward the later phase of the series.