Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Gold Stater - Aunt Cost Aunt Cost Left

Uitgever Corieltauvi tribe (Celtic Britain)
Jaar 15-40
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) ABC#1929 , Van Arsdell#910-01 , Sp#402 , BMC Iron#3258 , Mack#457
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Stylised lunate horse advancing left, rendered in the abstract Celtic manner typical of late Iron Age British coinage. The horse features a disproportionately large, round head with a pellet-in-ring motif, and a pellet at the centre of the body. A question-mark-shaped object appears below the tail, a recurring device on Corieltauvi issues. The tribal inscription AVN T COST appears above and below the horse, frequently blundered or rendered retrograde, with the letter A consistently lacking a crossbar.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde AVN T COST
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The Corieltauvi occupied a territory roughly corresponding to the East Midlands — Leicester, Lincoln, and surrounding areas — and were among the few British tribes to develop a sustained coinage tradition in the decades immediately before the Roman conquest of 43 AD. The "Aunt Cost" inscription remains one of the more debated in Celtic numismatics; the prevailing interpretation reads it as a dual magistrate formula, suggesting joint authority over the tribe's coinage rather than a single ruler's name, though no consensus on the individuals involved has been reached.

ABC 1929 places this type firmly within the final flourishing of autonomous Corieltavian issue before Roman administration rendered tribal coinage obsolete.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT