Katalog
| Emitent | Miletos |
|---|---|
| Rok | 260 BC - 250 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | Drachm (1) |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Silver |
| Waga | 5.13 g |
| Średnica | 20 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | Deppert-Lippitz#529 |
| Opis awersu | Laureate head of Apollo left. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Lion standing left, head right; star above, civic monogram (MI) and T before, magistrate name in exergue. |
| Pismo rewersu | Greek |
| Legenda rewersu | ΛEONTIΣKOΣ |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (260 BC - 250 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 3798848110 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This silver drachm from Miletos, issued 260-250 BC, dates to the complex Hellenistic period. Miletos, a prominent Ionian city, navigated shifting power dynamics, often between the Ptolemaic and Seleucid empires. The coin's issuance, bearing the magistrate Leontiskos's name, underscores the city's continued economic activity and administrative autonomy. Such civic issues were vital for local commerce and asserting Miletos's distinct identity amidst a volatile geopolitical landscape.
Artistry: The coin exemplifies refined Hellenistic artistic tradition. The obverse features a laureate head of Apollo, rendered with classical idealism and emerging naturalism, characteristic of the era's sculptural trends. The reverse displays the city's emblematic lion, standing right with head reverted, accompanied by a star and the magistrate's name, LEONTISKOS. The lion's powerful musculature and alert posture are meticulously engraved, reflecting the skilled craftsmanship of the Milesian mint and its adherence to established civic iconography.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 20 mm flan, this 5.13 gram drachm adheres to the Milesian standard. Key high-points for wear include Apollo's hair and laurel wreath on the obverse, and the lion's mane, musculature, and facial features on the reverse. A well-preserved example exhibits a strong, centered strike, revealing crisp details in both the deity's portraiture and the animal's powerful depiction. Minor flan imperfections or slight off-centering are not uncommon for issues of this period.