Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Drachm In the name of Alexander III, Abydos

Uitgever Kingdom of Macedonia
Jaar 310 BC - 301 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht 4.32 g
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Head of Herakles facing right, depicted as a youthful, heroic effigy wearing the Nemean lion's skin headdress, the scalp drawn tightly over the crown with the lion's jaws framing the brow. The hair falls in thick, naturalistic locks behind the ear and along the neck. The facial features are rendered in the idealized Hellenistic style, with almond-shaped eyes, a straight nose, and slightly parted lips. No legend or inscription appears in the field.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Abydos
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Struck at Abydos during the wars of the Diadochi — the bitter succession conflicts that followed Alexander's death in 323 BC — this issue belongs to a period when several mints continued producing coins in Alexander's name long after he was gone, a practice that served the practical need for a trusted, universally accepted currency across the former empire. Abydos, controlling the Hellespont crossing, held genuine strategic value; whoever held the mint held a chokepoint.

Price 1539 places this squarely in the post-Alexander civic or Diadochi-era production, though attributing these issues to a specific political authority remains contested among specialists.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT