Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Diobol - Mithrapata

Uitgever Dynasts of Lycia (Achaemenid Satrapies)
Jaar 390 BC - 370 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round (irregular)
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Triskeles motif centered within a shallow incuse square, with three curved legs radiating from a central ring, rendered in bold relief. Lycian script characters are disposed around the triskeles within the incuse square: the dynast's name MITHRAPATA is partially rendered in Lycian letters visible in the field. The incuse square shows well-defined recessed borders typical of fifth- and fourth-century Lycian dynastic coinage.
Schrift keerzijde Lycian
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Mithrapata ruled as one of the more assertive Lycian dynasts during a period when Persian satrapal authority over the region was nominally intact but increasingly ignored in practice. His name is a compound of the Iranian *Mithra*, reflecting the Iranian cultural influence that penetrated the Lycian dynastic class under Achaemenid administration — yet his coins were struck to local Lycian weight standards, not Persian ones. The Müseler reference places him firmly within a dynastic sequence that used coinage as an assertion of local autonomy rather than Persian delegation.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT