Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Dynasts of Lycia (Achaemenid Satrapies) |
|---|---|
| Year | 390 BC - 370 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Triskeles motif centered within a shallow incuse square, with three curved legs radiating from a central ring, rendered in bold relief. Lycian script characters are disposed around the triskeles within the incuse square: the dynast's name MITHRAPATA is partially rendered in Lycian letters visible in the field. The incuse square shows well-defined recessed borders typical of fifth- and fourth-century Lycian dynastic coinage. |
| Reverse script | Lycian |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Mithrapata ruled as one of the more assertive Lycian dynasts during a period when Persian satrapal authority over the region was nominally intact but increasingly ignored in practice. His name is a compound of the Iranian *Mithra*, reflecting the Iranian cultural influence that penetrated the Lycian dynastic class under Achaemenid administration — yet his coins were struck to local Lycian weight standards, not Persian ones. The Müseler reference places him firmly within a dynastic sequence that used coinage as an assertion of local autonomy rather than Persian delegation.