目录
| 发行方 | Mantinea |
|---|---|
| 年份 | 300 BC - 250 BC |
| 类型 | Standard circulation coin |
| 面值 | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| 货币 | Drachm |
| 材质 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 2.46 g |
| 直径 | |
| 厚度 | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 制作工艺 | Hammered |
| 方向 | |
| 雕刻师 | |
| 流通至 | |
| 参考资料 | BCD Peloponnesos#1489 |
| 正面描述 | Helmeted head of Athena facing right |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | |
| 正面铭文 | |
| 背面描述 | Poseidon seated left on a rock, holding a dolphin and a trident. To his left, an owl standing left with its head facing |
| 背面文字 | |
| 背面铭文 | |
| 边缘 | |
| 铸币厂 | |
| 铸造量 |
ND (300 BC - 250 BC) - - |
| Numisquare 编号 | 6181701520 |
| 附加信息 |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon, issued by Mantinea between 300 and 250 BC, places it within the early Hellenistic period. Mantinea, an Arcadian city-state in the Peloponnese, navigated a complex political landscape amidst the Wars of the Diadochi. The issuance of bronze coinage, like this Dichalkon, signifies Mantinea's civic autonomy and its need for a local currency to facilitate daily commerce. It reflects the city's enduring identity and economic self-sufficiency during an era of shifting alliances and regional power struggles, distinct from larger silver denominations.
Artistry: While specific engravers are rarely identified on such local bronze issues, the artistry of this Dichalkon would reflect the late Classical to early Hellenistic stylistic trends. This era favored increased naturalism and expressive detail. Mantinea’s coinage typically featured local deities or mythological figures pertinent to its identity, such as Zeus Lykaios, Poseidon, or Artemis. The design served to visually assert civic pride and religious devotion, even on a small denomination, with the die engraving aiming for clear iconic representations.
Technical/Grading: This bronze Dichalkon, weighing 2.46 grams, conforms to established weight standards for Mantinea's denominations of this period. Numismatic assessment focuses on strike quality, as bronze issues often exhibit weaker or off-center strikes compared to silver. High-points of the design, like prominent facial features, are examined for wear. The planchet's fabric, including its shape and any casting flaws, also contributes to the technical evaluation. A well-struck example with good centering and minimal wear would be considered exceptional, given typical production methods.