Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Mantinea |
|---|---|
| Năm | 300 BC - 250 BC |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Tiền tệ | Drachm |
| Chất liệu | Bronze |
| Trọng lượng | 2.46 g |
| Đường kính | |
| Độ dày | |
| Hình dạng | Round (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Hammered |
| Hướng | |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo | BCD Peloponnesos#1489 |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Helmeted head of Athena facing right |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Poseidon seated left on a rock, holding a dolphin and a trident. To his left, an owl standing left with its head facing |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | |
| Cạnh | |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
ND (300 BC - 250 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6181701520 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon, issued by Mantinea between 300 and 250 BC, places it within the early Hellenistic period. Mantinea, an Arcadian city-state in the Peloponnese, navigated a complex political landscape amidst the Wars of the Diadochi. The issuance of bronze coinage, like this Dichalkon, signifies Mantinea's civic autonomy and its need for a local currency to facilitate daily commerce. It reflects the city's enduring identity and economic self-sufficiency during an era of shifting alliances and regional power struggles, distinct from larger silver denominations.
Artistry: While specific engravers are rarely identified on such local bronze issues, the artistry of this Dichalkon would reflect the late Classical to early Hellenistic stylistic trends. This era favored increased naturalism and expressive detail. Mantinea’s coinage typically featured local deities or mythological figures pertinent to its identity, such as Zeus Lykaios, Poseidon, or Artemis. The design served to visually assert civic pride and religious devotion, even on a small denomination, with the die engraving aiming for clear iconic representations.
Technical/Grading: This bronze Dichalkon, weighing 2.46 grams, conforms to established weight standards for Mantinea's denominations of this period. Numismatic assessment focuses on strike quality, as bronze issues often exhibit weaker or off-center strikes compared to silver. High-points of the design, like prominent facial features, are examined for wear. The planchet's fabric, including its shape and any casting flaws, also contributes to the technical evaluation. A well-struck example with good centering and minimal wear would be considered exceptional, given typical production methods.