Dichalkon

発行体 Mantinea
年号 300 BC - 250 BC
種類 Standard circulation coin
額面 Dichalkon (1⁄24)
通貨 Drachm
材質 Bronze
重量 2.46 g
直径
厚さ
形状 Round (irregular)
製造技法 Hammered
向き
彫刻師
流通終了年
参考文献 BCD Peloponnesos#1489
表面の説明 Helmeted head of Athena facing right
表面の文字体系
表面の銘文
裏面の説明 Poseidon seated left on a rock, holding a dolphin and a trident. To his left, an owl standing left with its head facing
裏面の文字体系
裏面の銘文
鋳造所
鋳造数 ND (300 BC - 250 BC) - -
Numisquare ID 6181701520
追加情報

Historical Context: This Dichalkon, issued by Mantinea between 300 and 250 BC, places it within the early Hellenistic period. Mantinea, an Arcadian city-state in the Peloponnese, navigated a complex political landscape amidst the Wars of the Diadochi. The issuance of bronze coinage, like this Dichalkon, signifies Mantinea's civic autonomy and its need for a local currency to facilitate daily commerce. It reflects the city's enduring identity and economic self-sufficiency during an era of shifting alliances and regional power struggles, distinct from larger silver denominations.

Artistry: While specific engravers are rarely identified on such local bronze issues, the artistry of this Dichalkon would reflect the late Classical to early Hellenistic stylistic trends. This era favored increased naturalism and expressive detail. Mantinea’s coinage typically featured local deities or mythological figures pertinent to its identity, such as Zeus Lykaios, Poseidon, or Artemis. The design served to visually assert civic pride and religious devotion, even on a small denomination, with the die engraving aiming for clear iconic representations.

Technical/Grading: This bronze Dichalkon, weighing 2.46 grams, conforms to established weight standards for Mantinea's denominations of this period. Numismatic assessment focuses on strike quality, as bronze issues often exhibit weaker or off-center strikes compared to silver. High-points of the design, like prominent facial features, are examined for wear. The planchet's fabric, including its shape and any casting flaws, also contributes to the technical evaluation. A well-struck example with good centering and minimal wear would be considered exceptional, given typical production methods.

×