Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | County of Leuven (Brussels) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1040-1054 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Hammered reverse displaying a plain cross extending to the inner border, dividing the field into four quadrants each containing a triskelion or spiral ornament, with a small crescent or pellet also visible in the field. A beaded or rope-pattern inner circle encloses the cross design. The outer legend, introduced by a cross pattée, reads IOTGERVS MPT, identifying the moneyer Otger responsible for this issue. The rendering of the cross and its associated ornamental fillers is consistent with Low Countries coinage practice of the mid-eleventh century, reflecting both Carolingian and Ottonian die-cutting traditions. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (1040-1054) |
| Additional information |
Otger was one of several moneyers operating under Count Lambert II of Leuven during the mid-eleventh century, a period when the county was consolidating control over the Brussels mint as part of broader efforts to assert fiscal independence from imperial and episcopal oversight. The moneyer-named denier — a Carolingian monetary form still dominant in the Low Countries at this date — places Otger within a tradition where individual moneyers bore personal accountability for alloy quality, a practice increasingly displaced by centralized comital control across the following century.