Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Denier - Henry II/III Bridge

Uitgever Brabant, Duchy of
Jaar 1235-1261
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Groot (1183-1506)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A bold Brabantine-style cross divides the field into four quarters. In two diagonally opposite quarters, a small dot and a circled dot (annulet with central pellet) are present, while the remaining two quarters each contain a leaf-like or trefoil foliate decoration. The cross arms are plain and well-defined, and the design fills the flan to its irregular edges. No surrounding legend is present, consistent with anonymous bracteate-related issues of the Duchy of Brabant.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The overlap in attribution between Henry II (d. 1248) and Henry III reflects a genuine scholarly problem: these deniers are nearly impossible to assign by reign on physical evidence alone, and the date range straddles both. Witte's split references — #111 and #116 — acknowledge distinct die groupings rather than a clean dynastic boundary.

Brabant's mid-thirteenth century coinage was under constant pressure from neighboring Flemish and Lotharingian issues competing for regional trade circulation. The low weight standard here is not degradation — it was deliberate, aligning Brabantine small change with the lighter penny conventions then spreading through the Low Countries.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT