Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Denier Bracteate
| Uitgever | Dömitz, City of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1250-1299 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | As a bracteate, the reverse presents a mirror-image incuse impression of the obverse design, showing the same city gate or tower motif in intaglio relief. The thin hammered flan exhibits the typical irregular edge contour associated with medieval North German bracteate production. No additional decorative or inscriptional elements are present on the reverse. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (1250-1299) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Dömitz, a small fortified town on the Elbe, held minting rights during the late thirteenth century within the complex web of ecclesiastical and secular privileges that governed north German coinage. Bracteates of this type — single-sided, struck on thin fabric — were the dominant small denomination across much of the north German plain precisely because they were cheap to produce and could be recalled and restruck periodically, a practice known as Renovatio monetae that allowed issuing authorities to collect seigniorage on the exchange.
Jesse #163 remains the primary reference for this Dömitz attribution, with Dann's Sachsen corpus corroborating the assignment.