See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denga - Vasily II the Blind

Issuer Moscow, Grand principality of
Year 1425-1446
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Rouble (1381-1534)
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering К N
Reverse description The reverse bears a multi-line pseudo-Arabic inscription filling the central field, rendered in imitation of Tatar Golden Horde coinage legends but without coherent Arabic meaning. The characters are arranged in horizontal registers within an oval cartouche-like border, faithfully mimicking the visual appearance of contemporary Islamic coin legends. This practice of incorporating imitation Arabic script reflects the political and commercial relationships between the Grand Principality of Moscow and the Golden Horde during the mid-15th century. The execution is crude and the individual letter forms are largely decorative rather than legible, a hallmark of this coin type.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Vasily II earned his epithet the hard way: blinded by his cousin Dmitry Shemyaka in 1446 during one of the most brutal succession disputes in Muscovite history. The denga issues spanning his reign reflect that instability — production was intermittent, dies were cut by multiple craftsmen working without consistent standards, and the coinage circulated through a principality that changed hands more than once before Vasily ultimately consolidated control.

The Mets and Oreshnikov references diverge on attribution for several dies within this type, a disagreement rooted in the near-identical iconographic conventions shared across competing mints of the period.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE