Katalog
| Emittent | Eravisci |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 50 BC - 1 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | 1 Denarius |
| Währung | Denarius |
| Material | Silver |
| Gewicht | 3.26 g |
| Durchmesser | 17 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered |
| Ausrichtung | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | Kostial#1015, CCCBM 1#I-269 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Head of Juno Sospita to right; T behind. |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Latin |
| Averslegende | T |
| Reversbeschreibung | Globe, rudder and thunderbolt; RAVIƧ below. |
| Reversschrift | Latin |
| Reverslegende | RAVIƧ |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (50 BC - 1 BC) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 3702346290 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This Denarius Juno was issued by the Eravisci, a prominent Celtic tribe in Pannonia, between 50 BC and 1 BC. This late Iron Age period was marked by escalating Roman influence preceding the region's eventual incorporation into the Roman Empire. The Eravisci, while autonomous, adopted Roman monetary forms, minting silver denarii. These coins were crucial for trade and symbolized their engagement with the expanding Roman economy and culture, often adapting Roman iconography within their own tribal context.
Artistry: The anonymous engraver's work reflects the distinct Pannonian Celtic stylistic school. The design is a clear imitation of Roman Republican denarii, likely featuring the head of Juno, a major Roman deity. Celtic interpretations often "barbarized" classical Roman prototypes, imbuing them with a more abstract, stylized quality characteristic of Celtic art, yet retaining recognizable features. This syncretism highlights the cultural dialogue between Roman and indigenous traditions during this transitional era.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a silver flan (3.26g, 17mm), this coin exhibits typical characteristics of contemporary Celtic minting. High-points for grading include Juno's hair, diadem, and facial features on the obverse, and any central device on the reverse. Technical strike qualities often vary; common issues include irregular flans, slight off-centering, and variable die wear impacting design completeness. A well-centered strike with strong relief on both sides, free from significant flan defects, would represent a premium example.