Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Roman Imperial Mint |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 70 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Rome |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Struck in 70 AD, the year Rome sacked Jerusalem and Vespasian was consolidating his grip on an empire still raw from the civil wars of 69, this aureus is a deliberate dynastic statement. Both sons appear as co-holders of future authority — Titus as consul, Domitian as praetor — not because either office carried immediate weight, but because Vespasian needed the Roman world to understand that the Flavians were a family, not a coup.
RIC II.1 1301 is a rare type. The triple-portrait arrangement had no real Republican precedent, and it was not repeated with any regularity by later dynasties.