Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Roman Imperial Mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 70 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Rome |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Struck in 70 AD, the year Rome sacked Jerusalem and Vespasian was consolidating his grip on an empire still raw from the civil wars of 69, this aureus is a deliberate dynastic statement. Both sons appear as co-holders of future authority — Titus as consul, Domitian as praetor — not because either office carried immediate weight, but because Vespasian needed the Roman world to understand that the Flavians were a family, not a coup.
RIC II.1 1301 is a rare type. The triple-portrait arrangement had no real Republican precedent, and it was not repeated with any regularity by later dynasties.