Katalog
Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos
oder mit E-Mail registrieren
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
Alchon-Nezak Crossover AE fractional unit
| Emittent | Alchon Huns |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 450-700 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | 15.65 mm |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Highly stylized representation of a Sasanian-derived fire altar, rendered in a schematic and degenerate form typical of late Alchon-Nezak bronze fractional issues. The altar structure is depicted frontally with a stepped or rectangular base and upright lateral elements flanking a central flame motif indicated by dot or pellet devices. A small attendant symbol, possibly a crescent or annulet, appears in the left field. The overall design is severely abstracted, reflecting the progressive barbarization of the Sasanian prototype over successive generations of Hunnic die-cutting. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Rough |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The Alchon-Nezak crossover types occupy one of the murkier corners of late antique numismatics, where attributing a coin to one dynasty or the other remains genuinely contested. Both groups operated across the Hindu Kush and into Gandhara during overlapping periods, and their administrative and dynastic boundaries were porous enough that shared iconographic programs and striking practices blur the lines considerably. Some scholars treat these crossover pieces as transitional issues struck during succession or territorial handover; others read them as deliberate imitations.
At this weight, the coin sits at the fractional end of a bronze series that was never well standardized across mints.