Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Creteia-Flaviopolis (Bithynia and Pontus) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 138-161 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | ΑΥΤ ΚΑΙϹΑΡ ΑΝΤΩΝΕΙΝΟϹ (Translation: Emperor Caesar Antoninus) |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (138-161) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Creteia-Flaviopolis was a double-named city — a pairing that reflects the Flavian-era refoundation of an older Bithynian settlement, with the imperial surname grafted onto the toponym as a mark of dynastic loyalty. Under Antoninus Pius, provincial bronze issues from Bithynian cities proliferated partly because the emperor actively encouraged civic coinage as a mechanism for local economic administration, rarely intervening in designs or denominations. The question mark trailing the reverse legend attribution in modern references signals a genuine reading uncertainty, not editorial caution — the epigraphy on surviving specimens is badly damaged across the board.