Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Creteia-Flaviopolis (Bithynia and Pontus) |
|---|---|
| Year | 138-161 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | ΑΥΤ ΚΑΙϹΑΡ ΑΝΤΩΝΕΙΝΟϹ (Translation: Emperor Caesar Antoninus) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (138-161) |
| Additional information |
Creteia-Flaviopolis was a double-named city — a pairing that reflects the Flavian-era refoundation of an older Bithynian settlement, with the imperial surname grafted onto the toponym as a mark of dynastic loyalty. Under Antoninus Pius, provincial bronze issues from Bithynian cities proliferated partly because the emperor actively encouraged civic coinage as a mechanism for local economic administration, rarely intervening in designs or denominations. The question mark trailing the reverse legend attribution in modern references signals a genuine reading uncertainty, not editorial caution — the epigraphy on surviving specimens is badly damaged across the board.