See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Æ25 - Marcus Aurelius ΚΥΖΙΚΗΝ? ΝΕΩΚΟΡ (Ζ shaped as エ)

Issuer Cyzicus (Conventus of Cyzicus)
Year 161-169
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering ΦΑΥϹΤΕΙΝΑ ϹΕΒΑϹΤΗ
Reverse description Demeter standing in a biga drawn by two coiling serpents, moving to the right, holding a long torch in each hand as attributes of her chthonic and agrarian cult. The serpents, sacred to Demeter, are rendered with sinuous, intertwining bodies beneath the chariot. The reverse type alludes to the myth of Demeter's search for Persephone and reflects the strong local cult veneration at Cyzicus. A Greek legend in the field records the city's neokorate status, with a notable variant Ζ character shaped in the form of エ.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Cyzicus held the title of neokoros — temple warden of the imperial cult — and competed fiercely with rival cities like Pergamon and Smyrna for additional neokoriate grants throughout the second century. The peculiar rendering of the Z in ΝΕΩΚΟΡ as a form resembling the Japanese katakana エ is a local die-cutter's idiosyncrasy, not a copying error, and helps localize this piece to a specific workshop within the city's output under Marcus Aurelius. Such epigraphic oddities occasionally allow attributions that the legends alone, read straight, would not support.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE