Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Æ Unit

Uitgever Yaudheya, Tribal republic of
Jaar 201-401
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Copper
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Yaudheya-ganasya jaya
Beschrijving keerzijde Standing figure, likely a deity or attendant, depicted nude in frontal stance with arms extended, holding objects to either side — possibly a fruit or globe to the left and a serpent or branch to the right. The figure is surrounded by floral or vegetal ornaments within a beaded border, rendered in the schematic linear style characteristic of Yaudheya tribal coinage of the 3rd–4th centuries CE.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The Yaudheyas were a kshatriya warrior republic occupying the Punjab and Haryana regions, known from Panini's grammar and later from Gupta-era inscriptions that describe them as a formidable confederacy. Their coinage is among the few surviving material records of a polity that resisted outside domination long enough to mint in its own name across two centuries. The specific attribution window reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty — the republic's numismatic chronology remains incompletely resolved, with Mitchiner's corpus still the primary reference precisely because so little excavation data has refined it.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT