目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | Latin |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | Barbarous imitation of a Roman votive reverse type, featuring a wreath motif enclosing a garbled pseudo-Latin inscription arranged in three or four lines across the central field. The wreath, imitating the laurel or olive wreath commonly employed on Roman Constantinian votive issues, forms a border around the central legend panel. The lettering is a crude, non-functional rendering of the Roman votive formula referencing the vicennalia and tricennalia vows, reduced to schematic strokes by an artisan unfamiliar with Latin. The overall composition faithfully echoes the layout of official Roman votive coinage of the early fourth century while betraying its unofficial, Germanic origin through the degenerate letterforms and irregular strike. |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
Barbarian imitations of Constantinian bronzes circulated widely across the Rhine and Danube frontiers during the fourth and early fifth centuries, produced by Germanic groups who lacked formal minting infrastructure but not the demand for small exchange media. The legends on these pieces were copied by die-cutters with no Latin literacy, degrading through successive generations of imitation into meaningless scratches — what catalogers call "sketched" or "blundered" legends.
The Arslan corpus leaves this specific type unassigned, which places it among the more poorly documented frontier issues.