Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
50 Kuna
| Uitgever | Hrvatska Narodna Banka (Croatian National Bank) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 2002-2012 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | 2023 |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Watermark, Optically variable ink, Security thread, Microprinting |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Portrait of Ivan Gundulić visible when held to light; optically variable ink (OVI) on denomination square shifting between colors; embedded security thread; repeated text across the center underprint field |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
The 50 Kuna was printed by the Austrian State Printing Works in Vienna — a long-standing arrangement that saw Croatia outsource its currency production abroad throughout much of the kuna's existence. This was unremarkable in practical terms but carried an obvious political irony for a nation that had fought for independence from a federal state only a decade earlier.
The design is credited to Miroslav Šutej, one of Croatia's most prominent graphic artists, working here alongside Šimun Šutej. The kuna itself was reintroduced in 1994, deliberately reviving a name used under the wartime Ustaše regime — a choice that generated genuine controversy domestically and internationally before the government pressed forward regardless.