Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Romania |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1919 |
| Type | Local banknote |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 *SZAM* Az Osztrak-magyar bank e bankjegyert barki kivanasagara azonnat fizet becsi es budapesti fointezeteinel OTVEN KORONA torvenyes erezpenzt Becs 1902 januar 2an Osztrak-magyar bank FOTANACSOS KORMANYZO VEZERTITKAR A BANKJEGYEK UTANZASA A TORVENY SZERINT BUNTETTIK 50 50 TIMBRU SPECIAL ROMANIA |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 SERIE Die Oesterreichisch-ungarische Bank zahlt gegen diese Banknote bei ihren Hauptanstalten in Wien und Budapest sofort auf Verlangen Funfzig Kronen in gesetzlichem Metallgelde Wien 2 Janner 1902 Oesterreichisch-ungarische Bank GENERALRAT GOUVERNEUR GENERALSEKRETÄR DIE NACHMACHUNG DER BANKNOTEN WIRD GESETZLICH BESTRAFT PADESAT KORUN PIECDZIESIAT KORON PETDESET KRON PEDESET KRUNA ПЯТЪДЕСЕТЪ КОРОН CINQUANTA CORONE ПЕДЕСЕТ КРУНА CINCIZECI COROANE |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
This note belongs to a brief and politically charged episode: Romania's provisional stamping of Austro-Hungarian 50 Korona notes to assert monetary control over newly acquired territories following the 1918 armistice. Transylvania and the Banat had not yet been formally incorporated — the Treaty of Trianon wasn't signed until June 1920 — so these overprinted notes functioned as an administrative instrument ahead of any legal settlement, circulating in a region whose sovereignty was still technically contested.
The Banat itself was disputed between Romania and Yugoslavia throughout this period, and the overprint applied to both territories together reflects Bucharest's confident assumption of full control before the diplomats had finished negotiating.