Catálogo
| Emisor | Russian-American Company |
|---|---|
| Año | 1815-1862 |
| Tipo | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Valor | 5 Roubles |
| Moneda | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Composición | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Tamaño | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Forma | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Impresor | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Diseñador(es) | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Grabador(es) | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| En circulación hasta | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Referencia(s) | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Descripción del anverso | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
|---|---|
| Leyenda del anverso | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Descripción del reverso | The reverse of this walrus skin parchment note is plain and unprinted, showing only the natural texture and surface of the parchment substrate, which served as the primary anti-counterfeiting characteristic of these colonial issues. |
| Leyenda del reverso | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Firma(s) | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Tipo de protección | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Descripción de la protección | Printed on walrus skin parchment, a highly distinctive and difficult-to-replicate natural material that served as the primary security feature for these colonial scrip notes issued in Russian America. |
| Variantes | Inicie sesión para ver los detalles |
| Comentarios |
The Russian-American Company's walrus hide notes are among the most materially unusual monetary instruments ever produced in North America. Issued by a chartered trading monopoly — not a state bank — to pay workers and fur traders at remote Alaskan outposts where coined metal was chronically scarce, these notes circulated in a closed economy with no practical exit for most holders.
The substrate itself was a pragmatic response to a genuine supply problem: paper could not reliably reach Sitka. The hide resisted moisture and rough handling in ways that imported paper could not. The security feature was essentially the material — counterfeiting walrus parchment in the field was not a realistic proposition.
The Company lost its monopoly charter in 1862, the same year these notes ceased. Redemption for surviving holders was neither guaranteed nor swift.