Katalog
| Emittent | Russian-American Company |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1815-1862 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | 5 Roubles |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Größe | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Druckerei | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Designer | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stecher | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Vorderseitenbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Vorderseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rückseitenbeschreibung | The reverse of this walrus skin parchment note is plain and unprinted, showing only the natural texture and surface of the parchment substrate, which served as the primary anti-counterfeiting characteristic of these colonial issues. |
| Rückseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Unterschrift(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Sicherheitsmerkmal | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale | Printed on walrus skin parchment, a highly distinctive and difficult-to-replicate natural material that served as the primary security feature for these colonial scrip notes issued in Russian America. |
| Varianten | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Anmerkungen |
The Russian-American Company's walrus hide notes are among the most materially unusual monetary instruments ever produced in North America. Issued by a chartered trading monopoly — not a state bank — to pay workers and fur traders at remote Alaskan outposts where coined metal was chronically scarce, these notes circulated in a closed economy with no practical exit for most holders.
The substrate itself was a pragmatic response to a genuine supply problem: paper could not reliably reach Sitka. The hide resisted moisture and rough handling in ways that imported paper could not. The security feature was essentially the material — counterfeiting walrus parchment in the field was not a realistic proposition.
The Company lost its monopoly charter in 1862, the same year these notes ceased. Redemption for surviving holders was neither guaranteed nor swift.