Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
5 Perpera
| Uitgever | Glavna Državna Blagajna (Main State Treasury) of Montenegro |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1914 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Rectangular |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | КРАЉЕВИНА ЦРНАГОРА Главна Државна Благајна исплатиће доносиоцу ове упутнице Пет Перпера ПЕТ ПЕРПЕРА Предсједник Главне Државне Контроле Министар финансија Вриједи за годину дана. Цетиње, 25 јула 1914 |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | КРАЉЕВИНА ЦРНАГОРА ПЕТ ПЕРПЕРА Упутница издана на основу закона од 25. јула 1914. Прављење и протурање лажних упутница кажњиве су по § §. 145 и 146 кривичног закона. |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Montenegro's 1914 note issues were produced entirely domestically in Cetinje — an unusual circumstance born of necessity, as the country lacked any established relationship with the major European security printers. The Austro-Hungarian invasion later that year disrupted the entire monetary apparatus, and significant quantities of these notes never reached normal circulation channels.
The microtext underprint is notable precisely because it was executed locally rather than by a specialist security printer. How effectively it functioned as an anti-counterfeiting measure under those production conditions remains an open question among specialists.