Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

5 Livres

Uitgever Isles de France et de Bourbon
Jaar 1795-1796
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Paper
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Plain typeset bon with serial number at upper left and date 1796 at upper right, beneath the header ISLES DE FRANCE ET DE BOURBON. The body carries letterpress text authorising payment to the bearer per the Règlement of 28 July 1790, with three manuscript signatures of colonial officials at the lower portion.
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Ink or wax administrative seal applied to the note by colonial authorities
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

The Isles de France et de Bourbon — Mauritius and Réunion under French colonial administration — issued this note during one of the most administratively chaotic periods in their history. The French Revolutionary government's grip on its Indian Ocean colonies was tenuous by the mid-1790s; communication with Paris took months, local finances were perpetually strained, and the colonial authorities were effectively printing money on their own authority to keep the islands functioning.

Three separate signatories were required — the Marine Governor, the Governor-General, and the Intendant-General — a bureaucratic redundancy that reflected Revolutionary-era suspicion of concentrated authority rather than any practical security logic.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT